The Myth of Gospel-Centered Preaching: Part One
Updated: May 2
Sometimes trying to put things right is when you are most vigorously putting things wrong. One of the current manifestations of the culture of conversionism is so-called “Gospel-centered preaching” (GCP). This is a method of preaching that purports—wait for it—to have the Gospel of Jesus Christ at the center. The problem is not the goal. The problem is that those who practice "GCP"—at least those I’ve heard—put a reductionistic Gospel at the center of their preaching.
The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the good news that Christ came to save sinners. Saving sinners refers to salvation. Salvation implies saved from and saved to.
What does "GCP" say you are saved from? The "GCP" I’ve heard has less to do with sin before God and more to do with failure before man. The message is that through Christ you are unconditionally loved, so no matter your personal failures, shame, or embarrassments, Jesus loves you. You are saved from failure before man. You are saved from not measuring up. You are saved from feeling sorry for yourself. You are saved from the guy in the neighborhood who personally slighted you.
What does "GCP" say you are saved to? The "GCP" I’ve heard says you are saved to freedom. Freedom to feel no failure before man, freedom to feel like who you are is enough, freedom to boost your self-esteem, freedom to fall into sin, again and again, you know, because we are all broken and Jesus loves me even if I don’t give up my porn habit.
In "GCP", when you are saved from failure before man and saved to freedom before man, this is labeled “Gospel hope.” According to the rubric of "GCP," if your sermon doesn’t have Gospel hope it is devoid of the Gospel.
The Pharisees preached a similar message that emphasized justifying yourselves before man. Jesus busted out the a-word to combat the error calling it an abomination in the sight of God (Luke 16:15).
So you have the damning situation where "GCP" is nothing of the sort, kind of like how family-friendly programming has a family with two dads. Not so family-friendly by God’s standard. Not so Gospel-centered, by God’s standard.
“Do you not know that if you present yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness? 17 But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, 18 and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness” (Rom. 6:16-18).
What does the Gospel actually save sinners from? Sin-slavery. What does the Gospel actually save sinners to? Slavery to righteousness. It’s not that Paul doesn’t talk about freedom. He does. “For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery” (Gal. 5:1). “For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another” (Gal. 5:13). Notice what “freedom” is contrasted with. A “yoke of slavery” (referring to slavery to sin) and “opportunity for the flesh” (another reference to sin). When Paul talks about freedom, he really means slavery “to righteousness leading to sanctification” (Rom. 6:19). In other words, through faith people are saved from sin to righteousness.
What does this mean for preaching that truly has the Gospel at the center? It means that to preach the Gospel is to preach justification and sanctification. It is a message that proclaims forgiveness in Christ’s name, where through faith one is made right with God. But preaching can’t stop there. Preaching must then, as Jesus said, teach “them to observe all that I have commanded” (Mt. 28:20). Teaching the commandments of God is part of preaching the Gospel. It’s the saved to part of the Gospel proclamation. Jesus is very clear that preachers who fail to teach the commands of God “will be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” Preachers who preach a full Gospel, including the commands of God “will be called great in the kingdom of heaven” (Mt. 5:19).
Now for a bit of tedious spadework. No one at this fine establishment opposes preaching that actually has the Gospel at the center. We oppose the preacher who talks about grace in such a way that leads people to think they are free from the burden of obedience. We oppose the preacher who is committed to the hope of changing man, yet renounces the right to bring God's Word to bear on what the new man should look like. There is a problem when man's conversion experience is less about acceptance of God and more about acceptance of himself. There is a problem when the law of God is used only to point out sin, thus ignoring the third use of the law. Chapter 19 of the Westminster Confession of Faith explains that for Christians the law is "a rule of life informing them of the will of God, and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly."
The "Gospel-centered" preacher who has abandoned theology, abandoned the Bible, and pushed a puny Gospel to the center of the table, has lost the credibility to say he practices "Gospel-centered preaching." The achieved success of such a preacher is evident in the forms in which his hearers have replaced a life-changing Gospel with a vacant one.
"GC" Preachers find themselves almost unable to call God’s people to repentance. In their thinking, proclaiming the commands of God and calling God’s people to repentance is the opposite of “Gospel hope.” It is legalism. John Stott had a word of rebuke to say to such an idea, “To teach the standards of moral conduct that adorn the gospel and insist that our hearers heed them is neither legalism nor pharisaism but plain apostolic Christianity" (Stott, The Challenge of Preaching, p. 35).
"GCP" confuses justification and sanctification. It says that the response to sin is simply to believe the Gospel more and more. It is popular now for churches to train members to battle sin with this question, “What are you not believing about the Gospel that is causing your sin?” The underlying mistake is this: "GCP" usually agrees that Christians are justified by faith, through Christ’s work. But "GCP" also says that Christians are sanctified by faith, through Christ’s work. This is a radical form of substitution. It is true that Christ’s work on the cross—Christ’s work alone—pays the penalty of sin and makes a believer holy and blameless before God. However, in the work of sanctification, while Christ enables obedience, it is the individual believer who actually carries out the obedience. The individual Christian actually prays (1 Thess. 5:25), loves their neighbor (Mark. 12:31), and resists the devil (James 4:7). Christians walk by faith, depend on grace, and live by the Spirit’s power. The Christian actually does these things. And it’s Christ enabling the Christian to do it. If the Christian makes a habit of not doing these things, then that is evidence they are not “born of God” (1 Jn 3:6, 9). It is legalism if you call people to obedience without acknowledging divine enablement. It is antinomianism if calling people to obedience doesn’t fit with your interpretation of the Gospel. Notice what Peter said, "[Christ] bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness" (1 Pt. 2:24).
The hypocrisy of the "Gospel-centered preaching" is that it is not Great Commission preaching. If the preacher proclaims that Christ is mighty to justify but not mighty to sanctify, then the preacher has preached a half-Gospel, a half-Christ. When the preacher proclaims that Christ saves from sin and saves to righteousness, he has preached the whole Gospel, the whole Christ. William Gurnall once said, “There is nothing more unworthy than to see a people bold to sin, and the preacher afraid to reprove them.” The shortest way to cultivate presumptuous sin is to relax the least of God’s commandments, and the surest way of refuting brazen sin is to teach all the Christ commanded.
To read part two of this series: Click Here.
NOTE: This blog post cannot be reproduced unless it (1) is reproduced in full without any modifications and (2) is credited to www.altarcallbook.com with an active link to the blog. Anyone who disregards this request will henceforth and forevermore be considered a cotton-headed ninny-muggings.